Category Archives: Knaphill Community

Bike marking event in Byfleet

bikePCSO Lesley Foster is inviting local residents to bring along their bicycles to a free marking session in Byfleet.

The event is taking place on Saturday 26 January 2013 between 12noon and 2pm at the Policing Post, St Marys Centre, Stream Close, Byfleet.

PCSO Lesley Foster said: “Cycle marking is a really simple way of protecting your property and if you have had a new bike for Christmas now is the time to think about proper security. Bikes are marked with a special pen which is invisible to the human eye but can be easily read under a UV light. The information written on the bike-frame makes it much easier to reunite bicycles with their proper owners if they are stolen.”

Many bicycle thefts can be prevented by taking a few basic precautions and bikers are reminded of a few safety tips by Surrey Police:

· Obtain a good bike lock (D locks or combination locks are best – ask for a recommendation at a bike shop)

· Lock your bike to something secure – a bike rack or lamp post

· Lock up removable parts (for example, wheels) or take them with you (for example, light fittings)

· If you store your bike in a shed or garage, make sure you keep it secure.

Sainsburys – service yard disturbance

On the 4th December a resident contacted one of the KRA members complaining about the noise coming from the service yard during the previous night. On investigation it was found that Sainsbury’s had erected a marquee within the service yard and were using it for additional storage. This meant that contrary to one of the conditions imposed by Woking Borough Council on Sainsbury’s opened the store. The condition states that between 7.00pm and 7.00am there should be no deliveries except by vehicles which are loaded and unloaded directly from the vehicle to the service bay building. A formal complaint was submitted to WBC. The issue was also taken up by Cllr Whitehand.

This is not the first time that Sainsbury’s have used a marquee in the service yard and last year they were informed that it required planning permission. Sainsbury’s did submit a planning application in January 2012 for the previous December and seeking permission to use a marquee during December 2012 and January 2013. This request was withdrawn prior to it going before the Planning Committee. Given the history you can understand our surprise when we were informed on 17th December that it was not a planning issue and that planning permission was not required.

At this point let me quote from the report the Planning Officer was going to submit to the Planning Committee In February 2012. ‘The proposed erection of a marquee for a temporary period between December 2012 and January 2013 would, by reason of the intensification of operations within the outdoor service yard and the lack of any acoustic insulation to the structure, result in an adverse impact on the amenity and peaceful enjoyment of neighbouring residential properties, contrary to policies BE1, BE4 and BE5 of the Local Plan 1999.’

Given the above the residents who live close to the service yard cannot understand why Sainsbury’s went ahead and erected the marquee given they had received such clear advice and more importantly why WBC felt unable to take any action, especially against the increased in the level of noise at night.

There is some good news, on 20th December Sainsbury’s voluntarily agreed not to undertake any activities in the marquee after 1 1.00pm or before 07.00am.

Also Sainsbury’s have now submitted new plans for the service yard to be fully enclosed. The Residents’ Association welcome this move and will be examining the details of the proposed enclosure.

P.Stubbs

Barley Mow Woods

The majority of Barley Mow Woods was bought by local residents and now managed by Woodland Trust so that we can all enjoy it. However 1.2 acres that residents were unable to buy is now on the market and could be developed.

History

Between 1870 and 1896 the Waterer Family of Knaphill Nurseries laid out the farmland as a nursery within the ring bounded by the lanes of Barley Mow and Barr. In Barley Mow a grid-work of paths was laid out especially on the western side, some of which respected the original field boundaries, some of which go back to 1790’s, but other paths cut a cross them. Groups of trees such as Yews and Redwoods in the extreme south west of the site follow the lines of some of the paths.

Woodland Trust & the good people of Knaphill

In 1992 the woods were bought by residents of Knaphil through local fund raising because the woods were under threat of becoming a site for travelling people. On buying the land it was passed to the Woodlands Trust to manage on behalf of the residents. More details of the woods can be found on the Woodland Trusts web site woodlandtrust.org.uk. Once in the site enter Barley Mow Woods into the search engine. Along with more information and some superb photographs you will find a map that clearly shows the land that is under the control of the Trust and the land that is now for sale. Another useful web site is exploringsurreyspast.org.uk.

Land for Sale

A local resident contacted the KRA to say that a for sale sign had been erected at the junction of Barley Mow Lane and Chobham Lane. The resident had contacted the estate agent whose name appeared on the board. The information that came back was that at the time of the sale of the land to residents in 1992 the person who owned this plot refused to sell. It is believed that the owner once owned Barley Mow house. We were later informed by the estate agent that the sale of the land was progressing. In the 7th December edition of Surrey Homes & property a resident came across a notice for an auction sale. The auctioneers are Barnard Marcus and in their sale scheduled for 18th December they are advertising a piece of land, ‘beautiful setting for this 1.15 acre woodland site fronting, with access via Barley Mow Lane Freehold with vacant possession. Guide £25.000 to £35,000.
The entry in the auctioneer’s catalogue contains the following paragraphs;

The property comprises a parcel of land extending to approximately 1.15 acres currently mainly laid to wood with a mix of species. The site benefits from a significant road frontage along Barley Mow Road.
Whilst offered on an unconditional basis the site may hold future potential maybe for development of an eco-style house or similar or simply a peaceful retreat within easy access of Central London’.

The future

We cannot stop the owner of this piece of land selling it to the highest bidder. What we can try to do is to protect our landscape, including our woods. It would be wrong for anyone being given planning permission or the right to clear this part of the Wood. There is very little the Knaphill Residents’ Association can do on its own. In the short term we have suggested to Woking Borough Council that a Tree Protection Order (TPO) is placed on the whole of Barley Mow Woods. The Woodland Trust web site states that a TPO is already in place, but it is unclear whether this TPO is up to date and whether it covers the whole of the woods. Secondly, and a project that will take much longer ask Woking Borough Council to examine the idea of extending the conservation area that exists close by. Where Barrs Lane meets Littlewick Road an area that contains a number of listed buildings is a conservation area. Close to the land that is for sale there are two listed properties, both houses going back to the 17C. It is not only important that we retain these historic buildings but also the setting in which the houses stand.

The woods are enjoyed by many of the local residents and it is hoped that future generations will be able to enjoy this part of the village.

Speeding has reached our limits

Recent debate has begun regarding the concerns of residents on speeding in the village. A recent poll showed that 55% have noticed speeding frequently, 25% often and 20% not at all.

Residents in Chobham Road, especially around the Knaphill Lower School area, have raised the issue due to inconsiderate and dangerous driving around the school. Near misses from speeding 4×4’s and ill-considered parking from parents dropping children off at school are at the center of the concern.

This is not the first time speeding, parking and traffic have been raised but we are in the very early stages of attempting to make sure it’s one of the last. All measures will be up for consideration and local councillors, police and the school have been invited to join in and take an active role – indeed the village will require their support if aims are to be met. One suggestion is for a reduction in speed limit to 20mph; you can read an article on this from The Telegraph here.

Shortly there will be a petition created for residents to sign to show their support for such a set of actions to reduce speeding and traffic problems, with a focus on the areas outside schools.

Updates on this topic will be posted here so please get in touch if you wish to add any information.

 

UPDATE 3/12/12

Cllr Melanie Whitehand has already been in touch and has contacted both Geoff McManus regarding parking and the police to help the situation…

UPDATE 4/12/12

We’ve met with county councillor Diana Smith (a fortuitous meeting while putting up lights around Anchor Cresent!) and SCC are in the process of installing speed monitoring equipment in Chobham Road. This can, apparently, take some time to put in place however so a quicker option in the interim is for the police to conduct some speed testing. The results from the testing in the High Street are about to become available so we shall find out what they are soon and what, if any measures are implemented.

12/12/12

The school now have a banner for safer parking on the front fence and the police presence on school days is having an amazing effect – well done all. I do feel slightly sorry for the police though, they look frozen today!

Sainsbury’s (Even more!)

We felt it necessary to update residents on the article we published on 26 October. Following our representation to Woking Borough Council the Council have published a number of the plans submitted by Sainsbury’s and their agents to meet the planning conditions imposed on them as part of the agreement for Sainsbury’s to build their extension. The plans can be found on the Council’s Planning web site under the original planning application reference number, PLAN/2011/0160. If you have difficulty in finding the plans please feel free to contact our secretary at secretary@knaphill.org.

In this article we will deal with only one of the planning conditions, the enclosing of the service yard. There are others covering landscaping, air quality monitoring and the barrier at the entrance of the proposed car park extension.

Service yard enclosure

As reported in October Sainsbury’s have submitted a plan for an enclosure that will be fitted around the whole of the service yard but the plan is not for a fully enclosed service yard as required in the planning decision notice. Although Sainsbury’s have stated that they will review their plans no new information has been received and therefore we can only go with the plans that have been submitted to Woking Borough Council.

A public consultation launched by WBC on 9th November closes on 30th November and therefore anyone planning to comment on the plans as they currently stand will have to submit their comments as soon as possible.

The KRA have asked Woking Borough Council to reopen the public consultation period if Sainsbury’s submit amended plans.

Litter pick 2012

A damp start to the day provided normal KRA operating conditions for the recent litter pick of Knaphill village, organised by our own Ann Mason and Antony Polack. Helped along by a pack of pickers, we had 15 helpers in all and our thanks go to each of them for giving generously of their time to help improve the village.

A considerable amount of rubbish was collected – the most common offenders being cigarette butts and energy drinks cans. We also found empty wine bottles, clothing, rags, receipts and the usual junk carelessly discarded or blown from topless bins.

Phil Stubbs also took the opportunity to rake the leaves up from the old library site in preparation for the service on the 11th.

Thanks should also go to Kate Wilson from WBC who came over from Surbiton just to help out and lend the use of garbage grabbers and provide bags for Serco to collect.

I’m mightily pleased that we got volunteers to help out and even though we got some funny looks for cleaning the village, it was a worthwhile effort to make the streets just a bit tidier. Lets hope the village can keep it that way for a while!

 

Distributors wanted

As some of you will know, we’ve had to use a delivery chap for the last year or more. While this has been an excellent service and we thank Richard for his efforts, two things have come to light – firstly, members that helped deliver the magazine before started to feel left out and wanted to re-start the deliveries. This is naturally a fantastic situation to have as we can now help them help us, so to speak. It also mitigates the second issue of cost of delivery which I have to admit was eating into the coffers somewhat.

Neville Hinks has been in touch with the old distribution network and I’m pleased to say that most roads in the village are covered by existing or recently found volunteers. We do however have some outstanding roads that we would appreciate a volunteer distributor for, they are (quantities in brackets) –

Cavell Way and Tringham Close (115)
Alexandra Gardens (200)
Lane End Drive (95)
Nursery Road, Halls Farm Close, and St Hildas Close (100)
Robin Hood Road, Anchor Hill, Waterers Rise, and Barnby Road (200)
Robin Hood Crescent (70)
Lansbury Estate (40)
Knaphill churches (50)

How it works

The magazines are delivered to the editor and sorted into piles by road. These will then be taken to the deliverer’s doorstep for distribution.

Anyone feeling ready, willing and able should get in touch with the editor ‘editor@knaphill.org

Sainsburys Redding Way (more!)

Although Woking’s Planning Committee approved the latest application from Sainsbury’s to extend their store in December 2011 the legal paperwork was only completed in August this year. With any major planning agreement there are a number of planning conditions that the developer has to meet either before the developer starts to build or before the shop owner starts to trade in the extension.

As residents will know, the determination of this application has always raised concerns on a number of grounds. Even now, such concerns continue and there are a number of procedural matters that the KRA consider still need challenging, even the general legality of the Decision that has been taken. The KRA has therefore made a formal complaint to Woking Borough Council.

One of the principle benefits for local residents that was to have been secured by the grant of this planning permission was the “full” enclosure of the service yard to address noise impact concerns. Such work was imposed as a planning condition which needed to be discharged prior to other works.

The Planning Committee (presumably even at that time sceptical of Sainsbury’s intent to deliver their promises), insisted that the design of the conditioned enclosure has to be returned to the full Planning Committee for approval and that the enclosure of the service yard had to be given priority in carrying out any building work.

One of our colleagues and Cllr. Melanie Whitehand met with Sainsbury’s team last week to discuss their plans for the enclosure of the service yard. The first disappointment was that even before that meeting had had an opportunity to take place, Sainsbury’s had already submitted their plans for approval to Woking Borough Council. The second disappointment was that it was quite clear from those plans that the current enclosure design does not deliver the “promises” made to residents and the Planning Committee.

On a slightly more positive note, Sainsbury’s team have advised that they will “re-visit” their designs. The KRA will continue to challenge robustly any proposals that do not deliver what was promised to residents (and the Council) last year. We will update you, once Sainsbury’s had advised further.

We also now wait to see what action will be taken by Woking Borough Council in response to our complaint.

P.S. Just in case any residents are wondering why they are not actually aware that the Council’s decision has been issued – there is a very simple explanation. WBC have not yet sought fit to advise you! That is despite such formal notification being a requirement of their own Statement of Community involvement and Charter for Development Enabling.

 

Alpha Hospitals Rose Lodge

A planning application to permit Alpha Hospital group to build a care home on the site of the old Rose Lodge that stood between Redding Way and Barton Close has been approved. Last week the management team from Alpha ran a number of briefing sessions to explain to local people the hospitals plans for this new building. The KRA was invited and attended but we understand that one of these briefings was for residents who live close to the site and we would welcome any feedback from anyone who attended any of those meetings.

One of our concerns is with the disruption that will cause to residents in Barton Close during the construction period which could last at least six months. We have asked WBC if the larger deliveries of building material could be offloaded from Redding Way rather having very long vehicles trying to manoeuvre down Barton Close. We will add a note to our web site if we get any feedback both from residents or WBC on deliveries.

Lawson’s Fields and The Mound

Following on from the hedgerows post here, we have more news.

In previous articles we have given details of the actions taken by the landowner or tenant to the boundaries of the fields and footpaths that surround The Priory Hospital. We are still monitoring developments in that part of Knaphill / Bisley. As reported elsewhere on our web Surrey County Council has placed a stop notice on anyone dumping or removing soil or hard core from the site and we wait to see what action SCC recommends with regards to the material that has already been dumped on one of the fields.

We have also raised questions on the protection given to ‘The Mound’. This is the wooded area between Chobham Road and The Priory, we must point out that this land is not owned by The Priory. We are given to understand that our questions on protection of ‘The Mound’ have been passed to the appropriate officers at County Hall; again we wait for a response. Finally we hope that one of our local Councillors can arrange a meeting with the new tenant so that we can report to him on the comments we have received from residents and give the tenant the opportunity to explain his long-term plans for the fields and ‘The Mound’.