Not another take-away!

Woking Borough Council has received and published a planning application from a London based company to convert the shop/office that sits on the corner of Anchor Crescent into a restaurant/café/take-away. These premises were last occupied by Mackrell Turner Garrett, solicitors. The planning application is a formal request to change the use of the premises from A1/A2 to A3/A5. A3 stands for restaurant/café and A5 stands for hot food take-away. The applicant has also requested permission to remain open until 11.00pm at night.

If you want to express a view on this planning application you can either register on the WBC Planning web site or send an e-mail to developmentcontrol@woking.gov.uk  If you do intend to write to WBC it is important that you quote the planning application reference number PLAN/2013/0756 and the property address 8, Anchor Crescent, Knaphill.

The KRA are planning to use this web site to give residents more information on planning applications and developments within the village, more to come.

Surrey Police: Police Support Volunteers Required

The Junior Citizens Scheme aims to encourage children to be the responsible citizens.  It is an imaginative way of teaching primary school children how to identify risk and make positive decisions in everyday life. It provides practical learning for young people who are due to make the transition to secondary school, while at the same time encouraging good citizenship and sense of community responsibility.

Junior Citizens schemes are an annual event run on a district/borough basis as a joint initiative between district and borough councils, Surrey Police, Surrey Fire and Rescue Service and volunteers. Children take part in interactive learning sets which require them to make decisions about personal safety and the safety of others, while raising their awareness of danger and the consequences of criminal actions.

Each scheme runs over two or three weeks, depending on the number of schools attending.  There are two sessions each day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon.  Each session will accommodate one or two schools dependent on numbers. On arrival the children are split into groups and will visit each ten minute learning set in rotation.

Learning sets include some or all of the following ( usually 8-10 sets):

  • Fire Safety
  • Rail Safety
  • First Aid
  • Water Safety
  • Road Safety
  • 999 emergencies
  • Internet Safety
  • Stranger Danger
  • Electrical Safety
  • Garden Safety
  • Park Safety
  • Anti-social Behaviour

This is where you come in.  Surrey Police are after volunteers to assist with the delivery of this scheme in the following areas:-

  • Guildford
  • Woking
  • Spelthorne
  • Elmbridge
  • Runnymede

You do not have to be resident in the area, but you must be able to travel to and from the location of the scheme easily.  Travel expenses will be paid.

If you are interested please email volunteer@surrey.pnn.police.uk to request an application pack.

Kind regards

Nikki Percy

Police Support Volunteer Co-ordinator

Surrey Police

Parking in Knaphill is it an issue?

A report on on-street parking was presented at last month’s meeting of Surrey County Council’s Local Committee for Woking. The report contained SCC’s proposals for changes to on-street parking in and around Woking. The report states that the County Council’s parking team had carried out a review of on-street parking restrictions within the Borough and had identified changes which would benefit road safety and reduce instances of obstruction and localised congestion. The report goes on to state that the starting point of the study was an assessment of over 130 requests for parking restrictions from residents, councillors and emergency services! The report then breaks the whole of Woking down into specific areas and Knaphill, I assume, came under the heading Woking South West. I say assume because there was not a single mention of Knaphill. Does this mean that the County Council are completely happy with the level of parking on pavements, especially in the High Street, and with the congestion and accidents caused by cars and delivery vehicles parking outside the approved areas? I am pleased to report that the County Councillors who represent Brookwood and Knaphill rejected the section of the report covering our area. So if you have any views on street parking in Knaphill I suggest you contact linda.kemeny@surreycc.gov.uk or saj.hussain@surreycc.gov.uk.

Police NW update 11/7/2013

Friday the 5th July 2013 – Thursday the 11th of July 2013

In Your Area

I have to report that in the last week the following crimes occurred in or near to your area.

CRIMINAL DAMAGE

Crime Reference WK/13/3984 – Between 00:40 and 07:40 on Friday the 5th of July a car parked in HIGH STREET, KNAPHILL had a wing mirror smashed.

Crime Reference WK/13/4047 – Between 19:30 on Sunday the 7th of July and 08:00 on Monday the 8th July a car parked in INKERMAN ROAD, KNAPHILL had all four tyres slashed.

THEFT

Crime Reference WK/13/4063 – Between 00:00 and 00:15 on Tuesday the 9th of July the telephone kiosk at the junction of  AMIS ROAD and HERMITAGE ROAD, KNAPHILL was damaged and money stolen.

THEFT OF MOTOR VEHICLE

Crime Reference WK/13/4076 – Between the hours of 09:10 and 15:10 on Wednesday the 10th of July a vehicle parked in SUSSEX ROAD, KNAPHILL was stolen.

Please remember not to leave any valuables in your vehicle and always lock it, even if you are only leaving it unattended for a few minutes. It only takes a few seconds for an offender to seize an opportunity.

Can you please circulate the details of these crimes to the members of your watch if you think it will be of value. Remember that if you have elderly or vulnerable residents in your road this information may frighten them so please be careful how you deliver this message.

If you have any queries please feel free to email me. As I’m only in the office on Wednesday and Friday mornings I may not be able to respond immediately, however, I’ll be sure to reply as soon as I can.

Yours Sincerely

Arthur Brown

Neighbourhood Watch Volunteer

Sainsbury’s name change

This is a bug bear of mine so apologies for the verbiage. A massive superstore on the outskirts of a village and complete disregard for actual location, preferring to be called ‘Brookwood’ over Knaphill. All other Sainsbury’s stores throughout the country, as far as I can determine, are correctly named after their location. Not so for Knaphill who has had numerous problems with the way this business approaches local communities (this is a small reference to planning and conduct of the store on recent years in case you were wondering!)

Your views

This bothered me so much I created a poll to see YOUR views and a hefty final 76% wanted it changed to be named after Knaphill. Curiously, before I sent a letter to Sainsbury’s Plc head office the figure was 85%, it dipped shortly after. No, I am not saying they had anything to do with it, merely pointing it out.

As mentioned, I sent a request to Sainsbury’s asking for a name change to be considered as a part of their current enlargement of their Redding Way store. I got a quick ‘it’s been passed to our property team’ and nothing more for a month. So I chased it and got another quick response – NO.

The store is, according to the property team’s investigation, named after Brookwood Hospital and therefore has an historical link. This is despite having been convinced in previous years that reference to Brookwood be dropped (ergo the historical reference is not that important perhaps?), reference to the store in numerous communications being stated as ‘Knaphill’ and even having a current web site for the development headed as ‘Sainsbury’s Knaphill’ (http://sainsburys-knaphill.co.uk/contact-us/) which I fully expect to see changed soon. I was then passed to their PR company, GKA.

I would have been content with that if the store name had been ‘Sainsbury’s Brookwood Hospital’ which would indicate both location and historical reference; but it isn’t. It still just refers to nearby Brookwood to any visitor, despite it’s obvious address. So I replied and pointed this out to them, also that it was Knaphill Common prior to being Brookwood Hospital (so I am led to believe) and I got a quick reply – we’re not changing the name, speak to our PR company (although they ‘want to be a positive part of any community we are working in’. The level of engagement thus far is underwhelming.

Naming confusion?

I didn’t mention this before but I asked Sainsbury’s shortly after moving to Knaphill just why their store was named after a different village… They said it’s because of the railway station. Not to be a pedant (OK, partly to be a pedant) but that does not gel with their current line of reasoning.

I believe the real reason is that it costs cash to change a few details (new signage and name on receipts etc) and the people of Knaphill’s opinion is not worth the relative pittance it would take to achieve this. Personally I’d be quite content with either ‘Sainsbury’s Brookwood Hospital’ or ‘Sainsbury’s Knaphill’ but I am NOT happy with the current naming pedigree.

What next

What happens next? Well I forwarded on the conversation to Sam and Jodie at GKA and am awaiting a response. Just what they can do, even if they wanted to change the name is beyond me as it’s a separate company to Sainsbury’s. Still, I keenly await the ‘We’re sorry etc’ reply.

——————————————

UPDATE 9/7/2013

I’ve had several replies from various people with the same job title – Customer Manager – along the same lines. We’ll look into it, please contact GKA, no current plans to change the name, please contact GKA, despite references to Knaphill in documentation it is officially called Brookwood, please contact GKA, we’re awaiting a point of detail and finally:

I appreciate that the store’s name is a source of frustration for you given its location. As you have been advised Sainsbury’s is unable to change the name of their stores as the official name that was originally adopted is used throughout the organisation. It is important for each Sainsbury’s store to be clearly identified with one name so that it can be easily referred to within the company. To change the name could cause confusion from an operational perspective and may also lead to confusion amongst customers from the wider area who know the store as Brookwood.

The recent information mailings and website regarding the on-going construction project have referred to ‘Knaphill’ as this is how the store was referred to publicly throughout the planning stage. The information issued during planning and construction has been aimed specifically at the store’s close neighbours and does not affect the store’s corporate identity.

Sam Hinton (GKA)

For unable, read: unwilling. So there we have it – not going to happen. Sainsbury’s is apparently keen to be an active member of the Knaphill Community so if anyone has any evidence of them doing so please tell me as I can’t remember a single thing they’ve done apart from build a store and call it after a neighbouring village. I do genuinely want to know this!

 

Committee meeting minutes May 2013

Attendees: – John Butler (chairman), Debbie Harlow, Rachel Carney,

Andy Hills, Tony Hayes-Allen, Neville Hinks, Antony Polak, Phil Stubbs.

 

Apologies: – Ann Mason, Martin Dunham.

 

  1. Minutes of the last meeting

The minutes of the meeting held on 17 April were approved and agreed for publication.

 

  1. Matters Arising

All action points are covered by the agenda items and will be covered under their own heading.

 

  1. Projects
    1. Village Show

Plans progressing.

 

  1. AGM Feedback

John felt that although the number of members attending was small (25) there was a good dialogue with those who attended. The recent village meeting was raised and members stated that it had been welcomed and interesting. Members asked for this to become a regular event.

 

Debbie suggested that we should consider a village meeting later in the year.

 

It was agreed that for a village meeting to be successful there has to be a topic or issue that has the interest of residents.

 

Returning to the AGM and next year’s event, it was agreed that we should not just hold a business meeting but link it to a presentation.

 

It was agreed to carry this forward for debate after village show.

 

  1. Brookwood Farm

The formal decision notice and S106 Agreement had been signed off by WBC and Cala Homes and therefore work could commence. The decision notice and S106 are long complex documents and Phil will report at a future meeting.

 

Phil reported that he had been unable to obtain confirmation that the study of the A322 had been approved by the SCC Cabinet member for Transport.

 

Planning Issues

Separate report circulated at the meeting.

 

On the subject of Neighbourhood Planning it was agreed that at the next KRA open surgery we should facilitate a meeting on neighbourhood planning.

 

Action point

Phil to design suitable advertising for next open surgery to be designed and circulated.

 

8. Membership Secretary Report

Nothing new to report

 

9. Chairman’s Report

John reported on the meeting with Planning Managers, this was a general meeting organised for Residents’ Associations to a general discussion on planning.

 

10. Treasurer’s Report

Accounts being audited.

 

11. Secretary’s Report

Nothing new to report.

 

12. Editor’s Report

Andy reported that he was working on the next edition and that this should be published in early June. Andy would welcome any complete articles.

 

14. Date of next meetings

19th June 2013 Meeting to be held at Kings House Coffee Shop at 7.45pm

31st July 2013. Meeting to be held at Garibaldi starting at 7.45pm

 

Meeting closed

Police NW update 21/6/2013

Friday the 14th of June 2013Thursday the 20th of June 2013

 

In Your Area

 

I have to report that in the last week the following crime/crimes occurred in or near to your area.

 

Crime Reference WK/13/3563 – During the early hours of the morning on Sunday the 16th of June 2013 a number of vehicles in VICTORIA ROAD, KNAPHILL were subject to CRIMINAL DAMAGE.

 

Crime Reference WK/13/3563 – Between 10:20 and 11:15 on Sunday the 16th of June 2013 a number of vehicles in ANCHOR HILL, KNAPHILL were subject to CRIMINAL DAMAGE

 

During both these crimes damage included broken windscreens and windscreen wipers.

 

If you feel that you have witnessed any incident that may relate to one of the above crimes please call 101 quoting the relevant crime number.

 

 

Can you please circulate the details of these crimes to the members of your watch if you think it will be of value. Remember that if you have elderly or vulnerable residents in your road this information may frighten them so please be careful how you deliver this message.

 

If you have any queries please feel free to email me. As I’m only in the office on Wednesday and Friday mornings I may not be able to respond immediately, however, I’ll be sure to reply as soon as I can.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Arthur Brown

Committee meeting minutes April 2013

Agreed Minutes

Attendees: – John Butler (chairman), Debbie Harlow, Ann Mason, Mandy Olrod,

Andy Hills, Tony Hayes-Allen, Neville Hinks, Antony Polak, Phil Stubbs.

Apologies: – Rachel Carney, Martin Dunham.

 

  1. Minutes of the last meeting

The minutes of the meeting held on 13 March were approved and agreed for publication.

  1. Matters Arising

All action points are covered by the agenda items and will be covered under their own heading.

  1. Projects
    1. Village Show

John welcomed Mandy to the meeting. Mandy has taken on responsibility for the stall holders at the village show. Mandy reported that she had been in contact with Harding’s Garage, they were disappointed that they had not been invited to last year’s show. Ann stated that she had received a voucher for a free MOT from Harding’s, it came with the membership fee. It was agreed that Harding’s, if they wish to have a stand at this year’s show, pay the standard fee and they may wish to use the MOT voucher as a prize.

Mandy reported that Knaphill/Brookwood NCT will be providing baby changing facilities.

John gave Mandy a copy of the budget.

Action points

John to provide Mandy with a receipt book.

 

  1. AGM

Phil circulated draft Agenda, draft minutes of the 2012 meeting and his draft secretaries report.

John reported that Debbie had offered to stand as vice-chairman. All members of the committee were willing to stand for the coming year.

There was some concern as to whether we would have sufficient members present to provide a quorum. The number of members to make a quorum was 35.

Members of the Committee were asked to arrive at the church hall by 6.45 pm to assist in setting up the room.

  1. Brookwood Farm

Phil reported that he had been unable to obtain confirmation that the study of the A322 had been approved by the SCC Cabinet member for Transport.

Planning Issues

Separate report circulated at the meeting.

8. Membership Secretary Report

Ann reported that membership currently stood at 202. Confirmation letters to those who had renewed would be distributed ASA. Phil offered to assist with delivery.

9. Chairman’s Report

John stated that his items had been covered by earlier agenda items.

10. Treasurer’s Report

Nothing new to report.

11. Secretary’s Report

With regards to the transfer of the Welsh Guards to Pirbright, Phil reported that SCC had informed him that there would be a delay in the transfer as living quarters at Pirbright required a considerable amount of repair. Troops are not expected to transfer until April 2014 at the earliest. On schools SCC had reported that from the data supplied by the MOD local schools would be able to cope with the influx of new students when the transfer actually takes place.,

12. Editor’s Report

Andy reported that although the last edition included a number of negative stories the feedback had been positive. The next edition would be published in June. Andy also reported that he was still looking for someone to take on the role of web master.

14. Date of next meetings

15th May 2013 Meeting will be held at Garibaldi starting at 7.45pm

19th June 2013 Meeting to be held at Kings House Coffee Shop at 7.45pm

 

Meeting closed

 

Police: Witness appeal following suspicious incident in Knaphill

Surrey Police is appealing for witnesses following a suspicious incident in Knaphill earlier this morning (13 May).

Officers are investigating a report that a 12-year-old female pupil was approached by a man in a green vehicle in Raglan Road at the junction with Hermitage Road around 8am.

Patrols have been stepped up in the area and an investigation is underway.

Police are appealing to anyone who witnessed this incident or anyone who has seen a green vehicle acting suspiciously in the area, or anyone with any other information which could assist the enquiry, to come forward as a matter of urgency.

West Surrey Detective Chief Inspector Karen Mizzi said: “If anyone has any information which could assist, we would urge them to make contact with us straightaway. We are following up a number of lines of enquiry, but any assistance would be gratefully received.”

Woking Neighbourhood Inspector John Davies added: “We have stepped up patrols in the Knaphill area and will be working with the local community to try to establish what exactly has taken place.”

If you can help, please contact Surrey Police on 101, quoting incident reference number P13138917 or if you would prefer not to leave your name, call Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111

Coral want to open a second Betting Office on the High Street

Late last month we read in the local paper that Coral Racing had applied for a premises licence for 13 High Street, the old HSBC Bank. The notice did not give very much detail and so we wrote to Coral asking if it was their intention to move their current betting office or operate two shops?

We have now received a response and Coral have confirmed that their plans for 13 High Street are to operate a full licenced betting office (over the counter transactions as well as 4 fixed odds betting terminals). With regards to the current betting office at 29A High Street Coral state that they plan to operate the two premises for a minimum of 3 months and then decided whether there is sufficient business to operate both shops.

So the application for a full premises licence for 13 High Street is in addition to the licence held on the premises at 29A High Street.

Do you believe that we, the residents, want two betting shops in the centre of the village?

 

Footnote: If you want to read more about fixed odds betting terminals such as those operated by Coral then please look at this Google search.